<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For shame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drsavta.com/wordpress/2008/10/03/for-shame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drsavta.com/wordpress/2008/10/03/for-shame/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Savta</title>
		<link>http://drsavta.com/wordpress/2008/10/03/for-shame/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Savta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drsavta.com/wordpress/?p=423#comment-335</guid>
		<description>I am surprised that you think that she is a dangerous influence.  Aside from the abortion issue, which, let&#039;s face it, she has no influence on and won&#039;t, even were she to become president, I don&#039;t know of anything that can even be perceived as dangerous.  Teddy Roosevelt was about as qualified as she is.  The main stream media have created a persona that does not correspond to the person they are referring to.  Something about openness and honesty and vulnerability and a woman being strong on her own terms seems to scare them.  I am not at all worried.  I would prefer a breath of fresh, unadulterated air to vacuous promises of change and policies that shift with the tide of public opinion (or how the wind blows.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised that you think that she is a dangerous influence.  Aside from the abortion issue, which, let&#8217;s face it, she has no influence on and won&#8217;t, even were she to become president, I don&#8217;t know of anything that can even be perceived as dangerous.  Teddy Roosevelt was about as qualified as she is.  The main stream media have created a persona that does not correspond to the person they are referring to.  Something about openness and honesty and vulnerability and a woman being strong on her own terms seems to scare them.  I am not at all worried.  I would prefer a breath of fresh, unadulterated air to vacuous promises of change and policies that shift with the tide of public opinion (or how the wind blows.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://drsavta.com/wordpress/2008/10/03/for-shame/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drsavta.com/wordpress/?p=423#comment-334</guid>
		<description>She is being ridiculed but she is a dangerous influence in American life.  She is not at all qualified to be a back-up to the President of the United States.  I feel that the Republicans showed little respect for either the office of vice-president or the people of  this country to have chosen her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is being ridiculed but she is a dangerous influence in American life.  She is not at all qualified to be a back-up to the President of the United States.  I feel that the Republicans showed little respect for either the office of vice-president or the people of  this country to have chosen her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: drsavta.com @ 2012-02-11 15:14:28 -->
