<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: For shame	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://drsavta.com/wordpress/2008/10/03/for-shame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://drsavta.com/wordpress/2008/10/03/for-shame/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:04:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dr Savta		</title>
		<link>https://drsavta.com/wordpress/2008/10/03/for-shame/#comment-335</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr Savta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://drsavta.com/wordpress/?p=423#comment-335</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am surprised that you think that she is a dangerous influence.  Aside from the abortion issue, which, let&#039;s face it, she has no influence on and won&#039;t, even were she to become president, I don&#039;t know of anything that can even be perceived as dangerous.  Teddy Roosevelt was about as qualified as she is.  The main stream media have created a persona that does not correspond to the person they are referring to.  Something about openness and honesty and vulnerability and a woman being strong on her own terms seems to scare them.  I am not at all worried.  I would prefer a breath of fresh, unadulterated air to vacuous promises of change and policies that shift with the tide of public opinion (or how the wind blows.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised that you think that she is a dangerous influence.  Aside from the abortion issue, which, let&#8217;s face it, she has no influence on and won&#8217;t, even were she to become president, I don&#8217;t know of anything that can even be perceived as dangerous.  Teddy Roosevelt was about as qualified as she is.  The main stream media have created a persona that does not correspond to the person they are referring to.  Something about openness and honesty and vulnerability and a woman being strong on her own terms seems to scare them.  I am not at all worried.  I would prefer a breath of fresh, unadulterated air to vacuous promises of change and policies that shift with the tide of public opinion (or how the wind blows.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sandy		</title>
		<link>https://drsavta.com/wordpress/2008/10/03/for-shame/#comment-334</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://drsavta.com/wordpress/?p=423#comment-334</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[She is being ridiculed but she is a dangerous influence in American life.  She is not at all qualified to be a back-up to the President of the United States.  I feel that the Republicans showed little respect for either the office of vice-president or the people of  this country to have chosen her.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is being ridiculed but she is a dangerous influence in American life.  She is not at all qualified to be a back-up to the President of the United States.  I feel that the Republicans showed little respect for either the office of vice-president or the people of  this country to have chosen her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
